Normal form of the Zero-Hopf bifurcation
We follow the paper[Kuznetsov],[Kuznetsov2] and consider a Cauchy problem
\[\dot x=\mathbf F(x,p).\]
We denote by $\mathbf L$ the jacobian of $\mathbf F$ at the bifurcation point $(x_0,p_0)$. We choose a basis such that:
\[\mathbf L q_0=0, \quad \mathbf L q_1=i \omega_{0} q_1.\]
Under some conditions, $x(t)\approx x_0+2\Re w_1(t)q_1+w_0(t)q_0$ where $w_i$ satisfy the normal form:
\[\left\{\begin{aligned} \dot{w}_0= & \frac{1}{2} G_{200} w_0^2+G_{011}\left|w_1\right|^2+\frac{1}{6} G_{300} w_0^3 +G_{111} w_0\left|w_1\right|^2+O\left(\left\|\left(w_0, w_1, \bar{w}_1\right)\right\|^4\right) \\ \dot{w}_1= & i \omega_0 w_1+G_{110} w_0 w_1+\frac{1}{2} G_{210} w_0^2 w_1+\frac{1}{2} G_{021} w_1\left|w_1\right|^2 +O\left(\left\|\left(w_0, w_1, \bar{w}_1\right)\right\|^4\right) . \end{aligned}\right.\tag{E}\]
This normal form is usually computed in order to branch from a Zero-Hopf bifurcation point to curves of Neimark-Sacker bifurcations of periodic orbits (see [Kuznetsov2]). The flag
hasNS(see below) tells whether such a curve emanates from the point. Passingdetailed = Val(false)returns only the data needed for this branching procedure whiledetailed = Val(true)(the default throughget_normal_form) returns all the coefficients of (E).
Normal form computation
The normal form (E) can be automatically computed as follows
get_normal_form(br, ind_bif; verbose = false, lens = getlens(br), detailed = Val(true), # full normal form autodiff = true, # use ForwardDiff for the differentiations start_with_eigen = Val(true), # Val(false): kernel basis via bordered systems bls = MatrixBLS(), bls_adjoint = bls)br is a branch computed after a call to continuation with detection of bifurcation points enabled and ind_bif is the index of the bifurcation point on the branch br. The above call returns a point with information needed to compute the bifurcated branch. For more information about the optional parameters (nev, ζs, scaleζ, ...), we refer to get_normal_form. The result returns an object of type ZeroHopf.
You should not need to call get_normal_form except if you need the full information about the branch point.
Returned object
The call get_normal_form(br, ind_bif) returns a ZeroHopf point with the following fields
x0,params,lens: the bifurcation point, the full parameter set and the two parameter axes,ζ = (; q0, q1)(resp.ζ★ = (; p0, p1)): the real null vector $q_0$ and the complex Hopf vector $q_1$ (resp. the left vectors), normalized so that $\langle q_0, p_0\rangle = \langle q_1, p_1\rangle = 1$,nf: a named tuple holdingλ0: the (real, null) eigenvalue $\mathbf L q_0 = 0$, ideally $\approx 0$,ω: the imaginary frequency of the Hopf pair ($\omega = \operatorname{imag}(\lambda_1)$ where $\mathbf L q_1 = \lambda_1 q_1$, $\lambda_1 \approx i\omega_0$),- the coefficients of (E):
G200,G110,G011,G111,G021together with the derived quantitiesg110 = G110,f011 = G011and the flaghasNSindicating whether a curve of Neimark-Sacker points emanates from the point, - the remaining data used by the predictors: the homological-equation terms
h200, h110, h020, h011, h00010, h00001andv10, v01, β1, β2, τ1, τ2, x.
Returned object (non-detailed)
Passing detailed = Val(false) returns only nf = (; ω, λ0, dFp) where ω is the (complex) eigenvalue $\lambda_1$ of the Hopf pair, together with ζ and ζ★. This is the minimal information required to start the continuation of the curves of equilibria (fold or Hopf curves) emanating from the point.
Predictors
The predictor for a non trivial guess at distance $\delta p$ from the bifurcation point is provided by the methods
BifurcationKit.predictor — Method
predictor(
zh::BifurcationKit.ZeroHopf,
::Val{:HopfCurve},
ds;
verbose,
ampfactor
) -> NamedTuple{(:hopf, :ω, :EigenVec, :EigenVecAd, :x0), <:Tuple{BifurcationKit.var"#832#838"{BifurcationKit.var"#HopfCurve#835"{_A, _B}} where {_A, _B}, BifurcationKit.var"#833#839"{BifurcationKit.var"#HopfCurve#835"{_A, _B}} where {_A, _B}, BifurcationKit.var"#EigenVec#836"{BifurcationKit.ZeroHopf{Tv, Tτ, T, Tpar, Tlens, Tevl, Tevr, Tnf}} where {Tv, Tτ, T, Tpar, Tlens, Tevl, Tevr, Tnf}, BifurcationKit.var"#EigenVecAd#837"{BifurcationKit.ZeroHopf{Tv, Tτ, T, Tpar, Tlens, Tevl, Tevr, Tnf}} where {Tv, Tτ, T, Tpar, Tlens, Tevl, Tevr, Tnf}, BifurcationKit.var"#834#840"}}
Compute the predictor for the curve of Hopf bifurcations near the Zero-Hopf bifurcation point.
BifurcationKit.predictor — Method
predictor(
zh::BifurcationKit.ZeroHopf,
::Val{:FoldCurve},
ds;
verbose,
ampfactor
) -> NamedTuple{(:fold, :λ0, :EigenVec, :EigenVecAd, :x0), <:Tuple{BifurcationKit.var"#842#848"{BifurcationKit.var"#FoldCurve#845"{_A, _B}} where {_A, _B}, BifurcationKit.var"#843#849"{BifurcationKit.var"#FoldCurve#845"{_A, _B}} where {_A, _B}, BifurcationKit.var"#EigenVec#846"{BifurcationKit.ZeroHopf{Tv, Tτ, T, Tpar, Tlens, Tevl, Tevr, Tnf}} where {Tv, Tτ, T, Tpar, Tlens, Tevl, Tevr, Tnf}, BifurcationKit.var"#EigenVecAd#847"{BifurcationKit.ZeroHopf{Tv, Tτ, T, Tpar, Tlens, Tevl, Tevr, Tnf}} where {Tv, Tτ, T, Tpar, Tlens, Tevl, Tevr, Tnf}, BifurcationKit.var"#844#850"}}
Compute the predictor for the curve of Fold bifurcations near the Zero-Hopf bifurcation point.
BifurcationKit.predictor — Method
predictor(
zh::BifurcationKit.ZeroHopf,
::Val{:NS},
ϵ;
verbose,
ampfactor
) -> NamedTuple{(:orbit, :hasNS, :params, :T, :k), <:Tuple{BifurcationKit.var"#852#854"{BifurcationKit.var"#NS#853"{_A, _B, _C}} where {_A, _B, _C}, Vararg{Any, 4}}}
Compute the predictor for the curve of Neimark-Sacker bifurcations near the Zero-Hopf bifurcation point.
Reference
Kuznetsov, Yu A., H. G. E. Meijer, W. Govaerts, and B. Sautois. “Switching to Nonhyperbolic Cycles from Codim 2 Bifurcations of Equilibria in ODEs.” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 237, no. 23 (December 2008): 3061–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2008.06.006.
The :NS predictor gives an approximation of the Neimark-Sacker curve of periodic orbits and requires the detailed normal form (detailed = Val(true), the default). The predictors :HopfCurve and :FoldCurve only need the non-detailed data.
References
- Kuznetsov
Kuznetsov, Yu. A. “Numerical Normalization Techniques for All Codim 2 Bifurcations of Equilibria in ODE’s.” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 36, no. 4 (January 1, 1999): 1104–24. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036142998335005.
- Kuznetsov2
Kuznetsov, Yu A., H. G. E. Meijer, W. Govaerts, and B. Sautois. “Switching to Nonhyperbolic Cycles from Codim 2 Bifurcations of Equilibria in ODEs.” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 237, no. 23 (December 2008): 3061–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2008.06.006.